Anyone else here a fan of Asimov's science fact writing? He's written some very good articles on a wide variety of subjects, and I've found him to be so good at explaining complex concepts that I often check my Asimov collection first to see if he's written an article on it, and chances are, he has...
~Sam
~Sam
-
Unsu...
Re: Science fact
Wed, February 25, 2004 - 8:22 AMyeah....read one many years ago on the human skeleton. excellent.
also, found an old one on the shelf--Asimov on the Bible....looking forward to digging into that one.
relative to Foundation, tho, ALL books are a little boring. -
-
Re: Science fact
Wed, February 25, 2004 - 11:41 AMAsimov's Guide to The Bible is very good, as is his similar Guide to Shakespeare. I have to say that, with the exception of Foundation and his robot stories, I'm not that big a fan of Asimov's science fiction.
~Sam -
-
Re: Science fact
Mon, March 22, 2004 - 6:51 PMhi everyone, i'm new here. today i just picked up from the library a copy of our man's book Of Time & Space & Other Things. i expect to have more to say on it & on Asimov in general as i move along in the book, but for now i'll specify what got me interested to seek it out: i'd read somewhere else that it contains the claim that the earliest event in human history for which an exact date can be determined was the cancellation of a war between the Lydians & Medeians in Asia Minor because of a solar eclipse. this interests me because i have a project researching calendars & new years days with the eventual goal of creating my own calendar with the indicated date (corresponding to May 28 in the Gregorian system) tentatively being my starting day, with the year count beginning either with the estimated age of the earliest known cave paintings or with that of gold mines in Africa thought far older...i haven't made up my mind which, mainly because i'd still like to know if the bit about the gold mines is in legitimate dispute.
-
-
-
Re: Science fact
Fri, August 27, 2004 - 5:05 PMHey Sam! I completely agree. For years I had a subscription to Fantasy & Science Fiction and the first thing I read in every issue was Asimov's essay.
I don't have those original magazines, but I am fortunate enough to have almost a complete run of the magazine. (I found them at an estate sale. Carl Frame, whoever you were, thank you!)
I don't remember which article it was, but one of his essays discussed religion, atheism, and skepticism. It was a defining moment for me. This lead me on to other skeptics like Martin Gardner and Carl Sagan (my favorite dope smoker!).
-
-
Re: Science fact
Fri, August 27, 2004 - 6:16 PMMy favorite essay is one called "My Built-In Doubter"; I liked it so much I scanned and OCR'd it and put it on my website, risking the wrath of the Copyright Thought Police. :) A copy of it can be found at www.str.com.br/English/Res/fact.htm -
-
Re: Science fact
Thu, June 16, 2005 - 11:08 AMI read one non-fiction book by Isaac, which included a telling of the hunt for more inner planets to our solar system a hundred years ago. Astronomers were baffled that they couldn't account for all of the gravity exerted on the known planets, but decades later the mess was explained by the theory of relativity. This was the first time I was able to grasp an application of e=mc2. And just try to expain it to someone.... -
-
Re: Science fact
Fri, June 17, 2005 - 9:55 PMI have a special place in my heart for a collection called "Science, Numbers, and I." The first portion of the book was composed of some short essays on scientific puzzles, the second portion doing the same for mathematical topics. The final section was possibly one of the first autobiographical essays by Asimov, detailing his early love of the pulps and first steps to becoming an SF author.
I might have been 11 when I read this, and it brought home the idea that professional writers were not some special breed of people but could actually regular folks who loved reading stories and went on to write their own. So I can safely say...that bastard ruined my life! ;-)
-
-
-
-
Re: Science fact
Wed, June 21, 2006 - 9:28 AMI believe that Isaac Asimov's contributions as an explainer and factual speculator about science are right up there with his contributions as a science fiction writer. Two articles of his are in particular important as planetological speculations: "The Thalassogens," which discusses the set of substances which might form oceans, and explains why water is so especially likely in this regard was quite useful and prescient (among other things, it predicts the possibility of methane lakes as found on Titan), and another one, "Not As We Know It" (IIRC) but which discusses life chemistries and shows that nucleoproteins in carbon (our own) while the most probable isn't the only possible one.
- Jordan -
-
Re: Science fact
Thu, June 22, 2006 - 10:38 AMI think my seventh or eighth grade science teacher gave me a copy of Asimov's From Flat Earth to Quasar. And of course it worked very well for me.
-